University of Colorado at Boulder
BMP of Oil and Gas Development

View BMP

BMP ID: 4465
Title: Pipe Glycol Dehydrator Vapor to VRU.
Text: Table 1â€"Cost-Effective Options for Reducing Methane Emissions: "Pipe Glycol Dehydrator Vapor to VRU. Another option for reducing methane, VOC, and HAP emissions from a glycol dehydrator is to pipe the regenerator vent stack to an oil-storage tank equipped with a vapor-recovery unit (VRU). The vapor space in the tank serves as a cushion for variations in pressure and flow from the dehydrator and oil production. Additional gas recovery enhances the economics of a VRU. The VRU boosts the recovered gas pressure enough to inject it into a fuel-gas system, compressor-suction, or gathering/sales line." [see Table 2 and 3 in the source document for costs, benefits, and production characteristics]
Source Publication Name: Cost-effective methane emissions reductions for small and midsize natural gas producers
Citation Section: Table 1
Citation Page: 3
Supplemental Documents:  
Usage Type: Recommended
Timing: • Production / Operation / Maintenance
Oil / Gas Field:  
Surface Ownership: • Federal
• State
• Private
Mineral Ownership: • Federal
• State
• Private
Primary Contact: Environmental Protection Agency
Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC  20460  United States
Phone:(202) 272-0167     Alt. Phone:(202) 272-0165
Fax:     E-mail: 
Alternate Contact:  
 
Categories: Air Quality and Emissions
Location: General / Federal
Species:
Vegetation Types:
General Comments:
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Cost & Benefits : Equipment Cost = $1000; O&M Cost = $3000; Saleable Gas Saving (Mcf/d) = 9.0; Expected Payback = Less than a year. (Price assumption $5/Mcf); Operating Requirement = Existing VRU with excess capacity; Basis for cost saving = Dehydrator throughput = 10 MMcfd. operating cost is incremental electricity; Other Benefits = More gas for sale of fuel.
BMP Efficacy:
Date Entered: 2009-04-08 08:27 UTC
Last Updated: 2011-07-17 13:53 UTC