BMP ID: |
4656 |
Title: |
Select the Best Biotreatment Method for Your Site (Land treatment) |
Text: |
Solids and Cuttings Management: "Landspreading is the one-time application of waste to soil and is generally confined to small-scale projects that treat small quantities of wastes at or near the site where the wastes are generated. In-situ biotreatment also is a small-scale operation to treat oil spills in place. In contrast, landfarming and compostion technologies are usually used to manage large quantities of routinely-generated wastes over longer time periods. They generally require centralized facilities and long-term management, and thus have a higher cost to operate. Landfarming is distinct from landspreading or in-situ bioremediaiton in that in landfarming facilities, waste is reapplied to a soil. Landfarming is recommended for the following situations: large land areas are available, groundwater is very deep or an impermeable barrier can be easily constructed, starting oil concentrations will be less than 5% in soil, and longer treatment times are not an issue." |
Source Publication Name: |
Biotreating E&P Wastes: Lessons Learned From 1992-2003 |
Citation Section: |
|
Citation Page: |
2-3 |
Supplemental Documents: |
Minimizing Waste during Drilling Operations
|
Usage Type: |
Recommended |
Timing: |
• Production / Operation / Maintenance
|
Oil / Gas Field: |
|
Surface Ownership: |
• Federal
• State
• Private
|
Mineral Ownership: |
• Federal
• State
• Private
|
Primary Contact: |
|
|
Alternate Contact: |
|
|
Categories: |
Soils (Conservation, Pollution, Reclamation)
|
Location: |
General / Federal |
Species: |
|
Vegetation Types: |
|
General Comments: |
|
Cost-Benefit Analysis: |
Since landfarming and composition technologies usually require long-term management and centralized facilities, they often have higher operation costs than landspreading, which is one-time only and for smaller projects. |
BMP Efficacy: |
|
Date Entered: |
2009-04-16 20:06 UTC |
Last Updated: |
2011-07-17 13:24 UTC |